Generative AI (GenAI) has proven to be a transformational technology for many global industries. Particularly those sectors looking to boost their operational efficiency and drive innovation. Furthermore, GenAI has a range of use cases, and many organisations are using it to create new, creative content on demand – such as imagery, music, text, and video. Others are using the new tools at their disposal to perform tasks and process data. This makes previously tedious activities much more manageable, saving considerable time, effort, and finances in the process.

However, compliance as a sector has traditionally shown hesitancy when it comes to implementing new technologies. Taking longer to implement new tools due to natural caution about perceived risks. As a result, many compliance teams will not be using any AI, let alone GenAI. This hesitancy means these teams are missing out on significant benefits. Especially at a time when other less risk-averse industries are experiencing the upside of implementing this technology across their systems.

To avoid falling behind other diverse industries and competitors, it’s time for compliance teams to seriously consider AI. They need to understand the ways the technology – specifically GenAI – can be utilised in safe and tested ways. And without introducing any unnecessary risk. Doing so will revolutionise their internal processes, save work hours and keep budgets down accordingly.

Understanding and overcoming GenAI barriers

GenAI is a new and rapidly developing technology. Therefore, it’s natural compliance teams may have reservations surrounding how it can be applied safely. Particularly, teams tend to worry about sharing data, which may then be used in its training and become embedded into future models. Moreover, it’s also unlikely most organisations would want to share data across the internet. Strict privacy and security measures would first need to be established.

When thinking about the options for running models securely or locally, teams are likely also worried about the costs of GenAI. Much of the public discussion of the topic has focussed on the immense budget required for preparing the foundation models.

Additionally, model governance teams within organisations will worry about the black box nature of AI models. This puts a focus on the possibility for models to embed biases towards specific groups, which can be difficult to identify.

However, the good news is that there are ways to use GenAI to overcome these concerns. This can be done by choosing the right models which provide the necessary security and privacy. Fine-tuning the models within a strong statistical framework can reduce biases.

In doing so, organisations must find the right resources. Data scientists, or qualified vendors, can support them in that work, which may also be challenging.

Overcoming the challenges of compliance with AI

Despite initial hesitancy, analysts and other compliance professionals are positioned to gain massively by implementing GenAI. For example, teams in regulated industries – like banks, fintechs and large organisations – are often met with massive workloads and resource limits. Depending on which industry, teams may be held responsible for identifying a range of risks. These include sanctioned individuals and entities, adapting to new regulatory obligations and managing huge amounts of data – or all three.

The process of reviewing huge quantities of potential matches can be incredibly repetitive and prone to error. If teams make mistakes and miss risks, the potential impact for firms can be significant. Both in terms of financial and reputational consequences.

In addition, false positives – where systems or teams incorrectly flag risks and false negatives – where we miss risks that should be flagged, may come from human error and inaccurate systems. They are hugely exacerbated by challenges such as name matching, risk identification, and quantification.

As a result, organisations within the industry quite often struggle to hire and retain staff. Moreover, this leads to a serious skills shortage amongst compliance professionals. Therefore, despite initial hesitancy, analysts and other compliance professionals stand to gain massively by implementing GenAI without needing to sacrifice accuracy.

Generative AI – welcome support for compliance teams

There are numerous useful ways to implemented GenAI and improve compliance processes. The most obvious is in Suspicious Activity Report (SAR) narrative commentary. Compliance analysts must write a summary of why a specific transaction or set of transactions is deemed suitable in a SAR. Long before the arrival of ChatGPT, forward thinking compliance teams were using technology based on its ancestor technology to semi-automate the writing of narratives. It is a task that newer models excel at, particularly with human oversight.

Producing summarised data can also be useful when tackling tasks such as Politically Exposed Persons (PEP) or Adverse Media screenings. This involves compliance teams performing reviews or research on a client to check for potential negative news and data sources. These screenings allow companies to spot potential risks. It can prevent them from becoming implicated in any negative relationships or reputational damage.

By correctly deploying summary technology, analysts can review match information far more effectively and efficiently. However, like with any technological operation, it is essential to consider which tool is right for which activity. AI is no different. Combining GenAI with other machine learning (ML) and AI techniques can provide a real step change. This means blending both generalised and deductive capabilities from GenAI with highly measurable and comprehensive results available in well-known ML models.

Profiling efficiency with AI

For example, traditional AI can be used to create profiles, differentiating large quantities of organisations and individuals separating out distinct identities. The new approach moves past the historical hit and miss where analysts execute manual searches limiting results by arbitrary numeric limits.

Once these profiles are available, GenAI can help analysts to be even more efficient. The results from the latest innovations already show GenAI-powered virtual analysts can achieve, or even surpass, human accuracy across a range of measures.

Concerns about accuracy will still likely impact the rate of GenAI adoption. However, it is clear that future compliance teams will significantly benefit from these breakthroughs. This will enable significant improvements in speed, effectiveness and the ability to respond to new risks or constraints.

Ripjar is a global company of talented technologists, data scientists and analysts designing products that will change the way criminal activities are detected and prevented. Our founders are experienced technologists & leaders from the heart of the UK security and intelligence community all previously working at the British Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ). We understand how to build products that scale, work seamlessly with the user and enhance analysis through machine learning and artificial intelligence. We believe that through this augmented analysis we can protect global companies and governments from the ever-present threat of money laundering, fraud, cyber-crime and terrorism.