As FinTechs accelerate their adoption of artificial intelligence, the question of capability – what AI can do, and how it can improve efficiency – is typically overshadowed by the question of governance: how and where should this technology run. For an industry built on trust, regulation and the responsible handling of sensitive data, this goes to the heart of how FinTechs manage risk, protect privacy and intellectual property, and maintain control over their operations including cost.
A Down-to-Earth AI Approach for FinTechs
AI is transforming the way that organisations automate processes, with companies such as Tag Systems – a member of AUSTRIACARD HOLDINGS, and the biggest payment card provider for UK FinTechs – experiencing and supporting this transition. From document handling and onboarding to cross-checking and company-specific workflows, It offers an efficient automation alternative to manual, repetitive and time-consuming activities. However, in regulated business domains such as the fintech industry, processes that involve sensitive customer data or company-specific intellectual property need to be protected.
Most widely used AI models (LLMs, Large Language Models) run in vendor-managed cloud environments. This approach may have enabled rapid adoption, but it requires organisations to send data beyond their own well-guarded setting. Even when some protections are in place, question marks around sovereignty (and how data is stored and potentially used by 3rd parties in the cloud) remain.
For FinTechs, these are not abstract concerns. They are vital governance considerations. Therefore, solutions are needed to bring AI closer to (ideally, inside) the organisation, similar to that offered by AUSTRIACARD’s GaiaB™ – originally ‘GenAI in a box’, and also meaning ‘Second Earth’. By combining powerful (Dell) hardware with a cutting-edge agentic AI software platform, GaiaB™ Appliance keeps artificial intelligence in-house to ensure sovereignty, compliance, and control. A down-to-earth approach to adopting it.
Can Fintechs Risk Sharing Their Data and Intellectual Property?
When AI-driven tasks and processes run in a 3rd party managed environment, risk is also (partly) transferred to that 3rd party. In other words, organisations must rely on an external provider, not only for performance, but also for security, availability and compliance alignment. When AI-driven tasks and processes run in-house, that is not the case. For most fintechs, particularly those operating in tightly regulated environments, this is increasingly attractive.
One of the key advantages of running artificial intelligence in a controlled, local or private environment (potentially, even air-gapped, which is also supported by solutions such as GaiaB™ Appliance) is that data and intellectual property stay where they belong. Instead of sending information to external providers, organisations can process it internally, within systems they already govern. This reduces exposure, simplifies oversight, and provides a clearer answer to the fundamental challenge of making the most of AI without losing control of sensitive information.
Can AI be Predictable for FinTechs?
Many organisations begin experimenting with AI through online usage-based services (AI token – fundamental AI unit of data – dependent). This may appear to be an attractive OPEX proposition, but costs that appear manageable at first can escalate when it gets embedded in business processes and usage scales. Due to the nature of tokens, AI consumption charging models are typically unpredictable, particularly for smaller firms and those operating on tight margins. Such businesses may well become reliant on services for which they have not budgeted.
A more controlled deployment model means that organisations do not have to pay, or understand what they would need to pay, every time they use AI. Instead, they can invest in well-defined capabilities, which they can scale as needed. For example, GaiaB™ Appliance offers four hardware options (Tiny, Small, Medium, and Large), which can be used to create a modular and scalable AI infrastructure. Cost predictability enables FinTechs to align AI investment more closely with business needs, and avoid cost escalation.
How FinTechs can Target Optimal, Cost-Effective AI Performance
When AI is delivered as an external online service, performance can vary depending on network conditions, service levels or pricing tiers. In contrast, when AI runs within a FinTech’s own controlled local environment, the organisation can target more consistent performance. Consistent levels of latency and availability matter when AI is embedded into mission-critical operational processes.
In business domains where requirements evolve quickly, AI strategies need to be adaptable, not fixed. Equally important is the need to avoid dependency on any single AI model provider. AI is evolving rapidly. Models improve, new approaches emerge, and what is considered state-of-the-art today may not be optimal and cost-effective tomorrow. FinTechs should be able to adapt, switch and tailor models without being locked into a rigid framework. In these terms, flexible solutions of modular and scalable nature and of AI model independence are invaluable.
The AI Way Forward for FinTechs
Most organisations are trying to improve – not replace – human decision-making with artificial intelligence. Interestingly, some of the most popular use cases today are the least glamorous: automating workflows, routing information, extracting and classifying data, and supporting employees in repetitive time-consuming tasks. Such applications deliver considerable value from AI by improving productivity and allowing people to focus on higher-value work. Similar to other industries, the future of AI in FinTech entails the concept of agentic AI which has been gaining traction. Instead of relying on a single model or an autonomous/semi-autonomous AI agent, organisations can deploy multiple specialised agents that handle specific tasks.
To adopt AI successfully as a strategic growth lever within a secure governance framework, FinTech leaders need to balance cost and benefit, risk and reward. Can the organisation maintain control over its data? Does it manage risk and meet regulatory expectations? Can it control costs as usage scales? Can it adapt as technology evolves? Ultimately, can it deploy artificial intelligence in a way that supports real business outcomes?
The firms that succeed will be those that adopt AI with the right balance of control, flexibility and practicality.
Learn more at austriacard.com
- Artificial Intelligence in FinTech
- Embedded Finance